Friday, December 31, 2010
The Scott Sisters As Political Fanfare
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Political Snow Blowing
Monday, August 30, 2010
August 28, 2010
“This is our day, and we ain’t giving it away,” Rev. Al Sharpton declared Saturday at a rally and march that his National Action Network sponsored in Washington. Also prominent were leaders of the NAACP, the National Urban League, labor unions, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the National Council of Negro Women, Martin Luther King III and many of the usual allies on these occasions.
I heard no oratory that came even close to that heard at the Lincoln Memorial on Aug. 28, 1963 – 47 years ago, when Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., dissatisfied with the reception to his prepared speech, riffed the “I Have a Dream” portion for which he and the day are known.
Not far from Sharpton’s rally at the nation’s oldest public high school, Paul Lawrence Dunbar, or where the marchers ended up, at the site of the proposed King Memorial, the conservative, Tea Party, TV and radio huckster, Glen Beck, was making a fool of himself and, as I saw it, of the thousands who came to join him at the Lincoln Memorial to “restore” America. What they heard – if they listened – was a lot of hot air about God and love. As if his and Sarah Palin’s Christian followers (yes, she was a keynote speaker and, yes, they specifically made this a Christian event rather than an interfaith one) have a monopoly on that. Theirs was essentially an evangelical revival meeting without the communion sacrament and the passing of the collection baskets. “America today begins to turn back to God,” Beck declared. “God is not done with you yet, and He’s not done with man’s freedom yet.” In many ways his rambling, unfocused “sermon” at what also was clearly a politically-motivated power play, reminded me of Louis Farrakhan’s during the Million Man March – but Farrakhan did pass the collection baskets.
Before an overwhelmingly white gathering, blacks were featured as singers and prayer deliverers and – shamelessly – a niece of Dr. King gave her own “I have a Dream” speech, mixing her uncle’s cadences and various scriptural references. Alveda King, whom some apparently thought was King’s daughter, said: “I have a dream that one day soon God’s agape love will transcend skin color and economic status and cause us to turn from moral turpitude. I have a dream that America will repent of the sin of racism and return to honor. I have a dream that white privilege will become human privilege and that people of every ethnic blend will receive everyone as brothers and sisters in the love of God. I have a dream that America will pray and God will forgive us our sins and revive us our land. On that day we will all be able to lift every voice and sing of the love and honor that God desires for all his children.”
At his rally, Sharpton said of Beck’s gathering: “They may have the Mall, but we’ve got the message. They may have the platform, but we have the dream.” Actually Alveda King’s dream seems to differ mainly with that of Sharpton and others of the traditional civil rights coalition on abortion rights, gay marriage and prayer in schools. She’s against the first two; for the last.
While the Beckians were talking of taking back America, Tamika Mallory, the executive director of the National Action Network, was urging her audience to “take back our communities one by one.”
“We must not wait for others to do for us what we can absolutely do for ourselves,” she said. Tea Party supporters would not disagree with that.
In his last book, Dr. King asked: “Where do we go from here: chaos or community?” August 28, 2010, seems to answer: both. One group was “Restoring Honor”; the other’s aim was to “Reclaim the Dream.” Both groups were motivated to get off their butts and do something. But obviously, with leaders whose motives and messages can be questioned by people from all political spectrums, there is a great desire to build “community” – whether around God or a Tea Party movement or what’s left of the old civil rights coalition – but getting there without recognition of that fact is chaotic and probably doomed to failure.
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Where Is The Silent Majority?
A growing minority of ignorant people are convinced that President Obama is a Muslim with a self-serving motive in supporting the right of Muslims to build a cultural center in downtown Manhattan not any closer to the “hallowed” World Trade Center site than strip clubs and at least two existing mosques. A lot of these pea-brains – many of them no doubt Tea Party supplicants – insist that he is not an American and should not be president. Of course, they mean that he is black and should not be president. Some unionized construction workers, who long have had a history of thwarting the attempts of blacks to join their ranks, are soliciting pledges from fellow workers to turn down any offers to work on the Islamic cultural center site.
Mayor Mike Bloomberg has been a strong defender of freedom of religion in this paroxysm of ethnic and religious bigotry and political demagoguery. In a speech on Governor's Island, within the hearing of the Statue of Liberty, he said earlier this month: "It is my hope that the mosque will help to bring our city even closer together, and help repudiate the false and repugnant idea that the attacks of 9/11 were in any way consistent with Islam. Muslims are as much a part of our city and our country as the people of any faith - and they are as welcome to worship in lower Manhattan as any other group."
This has become a national issue among the ill-informed, especially after President Obama stood up for the rights of all, including Muslims, to practice their religion and construct their institutions wherever they want so long as they follow local zoning laws.
Gov. David Paterson is trying to come up with some sort of Solomonic solution, but so far neither the proponents nor the opponents of the center are paying much attention.
Don’t be among the ignorati. Do your own research on this issue and contact your representatives in the City Council, in Albany and in Congress. And contact your own religious leaders to convince them to weigh in. This article from Salon.com might be a good starting point.
Sunday, August 15, 2010
To Rangel Opponents: Who's Got Game?
A rather footloose Charles Rangel glowed in the best wishes of some 800 people, most of whom presumably paid the advertised ticket price of $250 to $2500 for his birthday at the famed Plaza Hotel. “He has fought for New York through thick and thin,” Sen. Charles Schumer told the throng of Rangel supporters. “We are so grateful and thankful for that.” And Andrew Cuomo, the state Attorney General who is the Democrats’ nominee for governor said: "His voice has always been a powerful voice for the forgotten people and the forgotten places of this nation. That's why we're here tonight to say Happy Birthday Congressman Charles Rangel."
The day before Rangel had offered an unexpected – and rambling – account of his side of the 13 ethics charges pending against him in the U. S. House of Representatives. He took to the floor of the House chamber for more than a half hour, against the wishes of his legal and political advisers, demanding an expedited trial so he can get on with his re-election bid. The New York primary is Sept. 14.
“This damn sure ain’t no funeral, is it?” Rangel commented as he looked out over the Plaza gathering. It was not. But if they have game, now is the time for his opponents to step it up. They should know this is going to take more than talk to depose Rangel when one of his buddies, the ever genteel (publicly at least ) former Mayor David Dinkins, gives the finger to a heckler as he enters the celebration.
Monday, August 2, 2010
Speaking candidly about race
Shirley Sherrod, God bless her, got into trouble because a lot of antsy people – from President Obama on down in his administration – don’t understand context. They don’t understand nuance. Well, there is a heck of a lot they do not understand, but let me stick with these two.
I believe I know Ms. Sherrod; but I do recall her husband, Charles, from my days as a law student doing anti-death penalty work in rural Georgia and then returning to the area as a national correspondent for The New York Times some years later. He was a founder of SNCC.
As a Columbia University law student assigned as a summer intern to work with the Atlanta-based Team Defense, I was part of a group of mostly Ivy League and mostly white Northerners sent to Dawson, Ga., to try to save the lives of five young black men that even a blind person could see were being railroaded with charges of murdering a white man in a rural general store. We filed all sorts of motions in preparation for hearings and then, if need be, trials. Because Jimmy Carter was president and was making a big deal about human rights, and because Dawson in Terrell County was one of the areas he represented as a state legislator and, arguably, as governor of Georgia, this story went, as would be said today, viral. Literally. Reporters from big news organizations across the U. S. and media from Europe came to look into this human rights abuse in 1977 United States.
Focusing our attentions beyond the hearings that would have to be had, we began researching the names on the list of potential jurors we had been able to obtain. One student and I met a man who had been recommended to us as someone who knew just about everybody in the area. He was a true Southerner; my student colleague was a true Northern fish out of water who just presumed that we had a typical redneck on our hands. But I engaged. I began to talk Southern – about the crops and such. My colleague thought I was nuts. But then came the good stuff.
Our “redneck” went over the list with us and gave us the 411. Then he told a story about learning how to treat black folks. As a boy growing up on a farm, many of his playmates were black kids on the farm. One day, feeling his oats, he called one of them “nigga.” His mama heard that and ordered him onto the porch where she blessed him out, telling him to never be disrespectful like that again. They were “nigras” not “niggas”.
Many people might not see the difference, but the fact that he did and could tell us who on that jury list was most likely to let racist views control the verdict, was what I respected. We would have had a damn good jury had not President Carter’s people pulled strings behind the scenes to assure that the case of the Dawson Five was settled in their favor before we had to go to trial.
Charles Rangel and House Ethics
Friday, July 2, 2010
Treat Elena Kagan Like You Would a White Man
Phyl Garland
We need a minimum of $100,000. But, as you know from the jazz record hoarder and gourmand that she was, Phyl was no minimalist. While the $25 check written at an NABJ gathering here and there is very much appreciated, that level of giving won’t get us to even a minimum anytime soon. The current recipients of the Black Alumni Network Phyllis T. Garland Scholarship are honoring her memory but actually being subsidized to the tune of $5,000 each by the J School, not from the endowed fund that we owe Phyl. Since 1998, we have raised only $78,228. What does that say about us, about our commitment to the future of people of color in journalism, about our love for Phyl?
Earning a master’s at the J School these days costs $60,000 (tuition, room, board). Journalists often brag about not being mathematicians, but even a math-challenged person can see that we have work to do.
In a news industry that we know is in turmoil in 2010 as it tries to figure out its future, Asian Americans and Latinos are doing far better than Blacks. News outlets in whichever medium need people like Phyl who could cover any type of story. In her days at Ebony that spanned from the dangerous days of the civil rights movement to the discovery of Wynton Marsalis.
The first five Garland Scholars are just the beginning of what we should be supporting.
Dani McClain [2005-06]: After graduation McClain was a reporter at the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. She is now a writer with the Color of Change in Oakland, Calif.
Sabrina Ford [2006-07] of California is a reporter with the New York Post.
Lylah Holmes [2007-08] produced a documentary on the 2008 presidential campaign and she talked about her work on “Charlie Rose” [PBS] with leading political reporters.
Jessica Hopper [2008-09] produced the award-winning documentary “Behind Closed Doors” with classmate Pracheta Sharma on exploitation of women domestic workers and labor trafficking in New York City.
Micki Steele [2009-10] left an advertising agency in order to go to graduate school. She is now reporting at the Detroit News.
Let's do Phyl proud, not with contributions -- which we can do in our communities and our networks in so many ways -- but in recompense. Send money, $$$$, to Columbia University GSJ for the Phyllis T. Garland Fund, 2950 Broadway, 704-C Journalism, New York, NY 10027. If you have questions after all this, contact Sharon Meiri Fox at 212-854-5263.
Monday, June 14, 2010
Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!
Fences as a play and Denzel and Viola as actors done us proud.
So did Memphis.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
Blacks and Broadway
Monday, June 7, 2010
June 6
I was born on June 6 in the colored side of the hospital in Conyers, Ga., the first of the six children of Minnie Ola and Johnnie Shipp. I call my mother on June 6 to sing “Happy Birthday” since, after all she did all the work that day.
That was 11 years after D-Day, a time well documented with a major exception: What about the black men who were part of that invasion of France and ultimately the liberation of Europe from Hitler’s Nazis? A column I wrote for the New York Daily News amid the 50th anniversary hoopla in 1994 dealt with that, caught the attention of Rep. Charles Rangel and ultimately led to President Clinton belatedly recognizing black vets during at a White House ceremony. Later, with all the rave about the movie “Private Ryan,” starring Tom Hanks. I wrote in a column about the need to treat WWII veterans better, starting with health care: This is part of that column: “In 1944, blacks were usually treated as uniformed laborers, barred from combat units. One of them was my Daddy, a farm boy and shoe repairman from Conyers, Ga., whose company arrived in France on June 12, 1944, the day before "Private Ryan" ends.
We need to be angry and vigilant about an even younger generation of veterans, those of war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Can you imagine what it must be like to be in your 20s without adequate mental and physicial health care or even job opportunities?
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Super Bowl 48: Bring It On!
Monday, May 24, 2010
The Reputed End of Law and Order: The Original
I am a big fan of crime dramas, none more than Law and Order and its various spin-offs. I have identified with it because of its “ripped from the headlines” plots and its use of New York City – my New York City – as parts of stories. For me, it was like a parlor game sometimes to identify exactly where a scene had been filmed. Sometimes scenes were filmed in my Harlem neighborhood.
Think of some of the issues tackled: domestic violence, wilding, forced female circumcision, adoption of black children from abroad to turn them into indentured servants, youth violence, a late night murder in a fast-food restaurant, gay-bashing, racial demagoguery. Even though each episode was preceded by a caveat that the story we were about to see was complete fiction, we aficionados knew differently.
The current cast in this 20th season includes S. Epatha Merkerson and Anthony Anderson. But over the years in recurring roles or cameos or bit parts, black actors on the show have included Richard Brooks, Jesse L. Martin, Ruben Santiago-Hudson, Michael Rooker, Viola Davis, Stephen McKinley Henderson, James Earl Jones, Samuel L. Jackson, Jennifer Beals, Ludacris, Edwina Findley, Ernie Hudson… And the list goes on. So do a number of careers. I get a kick out of reading the biographies of actors in theater; if they’ve been in New York for any length of time, it’s almost impossible that they did not do at least one episode of Law and Order. Indeed, two current Tony nominees, Viola Davis and Stephen McKinley Henderson, in Fences, are Law and Order alums.
I never watched Lost, so I didn’t care about its finale. Nor did I watch Friends – mainly because none of the main characters as a I discerned from People magazine would have been my friends. So I didn’t watch that finale. And I certainly did not watch Seinfeld, a self-proclaimed show about nothing when I was too busy to take time off for nothingness. So I didn’t get caught up in the hype of that finale.
But I do care about the end of Law and Order. Tonight’s episode will be only one hour. So I have a feeling that sometime in the future there will be a proper send-off. If Chuck gets a two-hour season ending episode, then certainly Law and Order deserves more than a one-hour finale to a 20-year run.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Haiti
So much is supposedly being done in and for Haiti. But how much is really having an impact on the survivors of the January earthquake and its aftershocks?
City Limits in New York has this new piece: http://www.citylimits.org/news/articles/4000/after-the-quake-rebuilding-haiti-from-brooklyn
AOL has this about Sean Penn’s work: http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/sean-penns-hardest-role-yet-haiti-camp-manager/19479788 - Sean Penn
CNN’s Soledad O'Brien has been vigilant even as much of the world press has turned to other matters, great and small.
Shakira has been there and plans to build a school.
The Haitian Times is going full speed ahead with plans for its Haiti Festival next month.
But I still think the government of President Preval is asleep, to put it in words that won’t offend my mother. He cannot wait for his term to be over in February. Of course, there might be another coup.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Gerald Boyd
Monday, May 10, 2010
Farewell, Lena. Farewell, Evelyn.
Halle Berry is the latter day Lena Horne with the benefits of what Lena Horne achieved in a life that made her high yellow features, as they were called back in the day, a blessing as well as a burden. Back in 2002, when she became the first black woman to be awarded the Best Actress Oscar, a very emotional Halle said: “This moment is so much bigger than me. This moment is for Dorothy Dandridge, Lena Horne, Diahann Carroll. It’s for the women that stand beside me: Jada Pinkett, Angela Bassett, Vivica Fox. And it’s for every nameless, faceless woman of color that now has a chance because this door tonight has been opened.”
At age 80 Ms. Horne said: “My identity is very clear to me now. I am a black woman. I’m free. I no longer have to be a ‘credit.’ I don’t have to be a symbol to anybody. I don’t have to be a first to anybody. I don’t have to be an imitation of a white woman that Hollywood sort of hoped I’d become. I’m me, and I’m like nobody else.”
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
The President and this oil spill
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Please support theater!
Denzel Washington, Viola Davis and Mykelti Williamson are in a limited-run revival of August Wilson’s drama, Fences.
David Alan Grier is one of the leads in David Mamet’s intense comedy/drama, Race.
And there is Fela!, a musical based on the life of Fela Anikulapo-Kuti, the late Nigerian performer and political activist.
Closer to home for many of you is Through The Night, written and performed by Daniel Beaty. It opens at the The Riverside Theatre, 91 Claremont Avenue at 120th Street in Manhattan on May 7. The special guest for opening night’s post-performance community dialogue is Bill Cosby. This is the official description: “Six African American males, ages 10 to 60, discover their power through one extraordinary event.” Beaty promises to “give voice to this community of men, those who love them, and what it means to be black and male in America.” In addition to Mr. Cosby, those scheduled to participate include Ruby Dee, Sonia Sanchez, Malik Yoba and Donnie McClurkin. General admission tickets are $20. For reservations, call 212-870-6784 or do it online at www.theriversidetheatre.org.
Except for concepts like Tyler Perry’s Madea, or Oprah’s involvement with a Broadway musical version of The Color Purple, we blacks get a deservedly bad rap for not supporting works that have something to say about our experience in the U.S.
Dorothy Height
"Look at her body of work," the President said. "Desegregating the YWCA. Laying the groundwork for integration on Wednesdays in Mississippi. Lending pigs to poor farmers as a sustainable source of income. Strategizing with civil rights leaders, holding her own, the only woman in the room, Queen Esther to this Moses Generation -- even as she led the National Council of Negro Women with vision and energy, vision and class.
"But we remember her not solely for all she did during the civil rights movement. We remember her for all she did over a lifetime, behind the scenes, to broaden the movement’s reach. To shine a light on stable families and tight-knit communities. To make us see the drive for civil rights and women’s rights not as a separate struggle, but as part of a larger movement to secure the rights of all humanity, regardless of gender, regardless of race, regardless of ethnicity.
"It’s an unambiguous record of righteous work, worthy of remembrance, worthy of recognition. And yet, one of the ironies is, is that year after year, decade in, decade out, Dr. Height went about her work quietly, without fanfare, without self-promotion. She never cared about who got the credit. She didn’t need to see her picture in the papers. She understood that the movement gathered strength from the bottom up, those unheralded men and women who don't always make it into the history books but who steadily insisted on their dignity, on their manhood and womanhood. She wasn’t interested in credit. What she cared about was the cause. The cause of justice. The cause of equality. The cause of opportunity. Freedom’s cause.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Civil Rights: The Changing of the Generations
At the recently concluded National Action Network convention in New York City, hosted by Rev. Al Sharpton, two things were evident in the context of present civil rights leadership. First: Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson are increasingly moving into the elders status. Second: The heads of both the NAACP (Ben Jealous) and the National Urban League (Marc Morial) are younger, more vibrant. But those two don’t yet have meaningful measurable track records.
What really hit home is that many of the civil rights legends from the MLK days, and even before, are at the end of days. Benjamin Hooks, longtime leader of the NAACP, a preacher, a lawyer and the first black to serve on the Federal Communication Commission – died last week at the age of 85. When I saw him a couple of years ago in Memphis at the commemoration of the 40th anniversary of MLK’s death, he was very frail. Dorothy Height, the chair and president emerita of the National Council of Negro Women, is very ill. She is 98 years old. And, according to Sharpton, Rev. Joseph Lowery sounds very weak though in a conversation he tried to assure Sharpton that he was OK. Lowery was an MLK contemporary and co-founder of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference with him. Lowery eventually became president of the SCLC. And last year he delivered the benediction at President Obama’s inauguration, beseeching the Lord “to help us work for that day when black won’t be asked to get back; when brown can stick around; when yellow will be mellow; when the red man can get ahead, man; when white will embrace what is right…”
Maybe because they don’t see such rather expensive gatherings as priorities or maybe because they have other outlets for mobilizing around social justice issues, there were not lots of young people present at the convention. Interestingly enough, it was 50 years ago that young people founded the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which gave us, among others, Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and Julian Bond, who recently stepped down as chair of the NAACP.
ADDENDUM: Dorothy Height died Tuesday morning, April 20, at the age of 98.
Monday, April 12, 2010
Presidents and the Supremes
They don’t always get what they want, but I’m hoping that President Obama sticks to his values as he nominates a new justice to the United States Supreme Court. That appointee would replace Justice John Paul Stevens, who has announced that he is retiring in June.
Here are a few examples of surprises to presidents and to senators who voted for these people who are guaranteed jobs for life:
· Justice Stevens, once thought of as a moderate Republican, eventually became the leader of the liberal wing of the Court during his 35 years on the bench.
· Justice Hugo Black, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, evolved into a key defender of the New Deal, the social revolution led by President Franklin Roosevelt, who appointed him, and a proponent of civil liberties and civil rights. Writing about Justice Black, Paul L. Murphy said in The Reader’s Companion to American History: “When Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed him to the Supreme Court in 1937, critics objected because of his KKK past; but on the Court he proved to be an active constitutional populist….In the final analysis, Black was a people’s justice. His opinions were clear and moving, and his commitments were to a constitutional order that would extend ‘liberty and justice for all.’”
· Black’s tenure eventually overlapped with that of a President Eisenhower appointee, Chief Justice Earl Warren, named to the Court in 1953. The Warren Court gave us the end of legal segregation and many reforms in voting rights and in the criminal justice systems in the 1960s. That prompted Eisenhower to declare that the appointment of Warren, a fellow Republican and former friend, was “the biggest damned-fool mistake I ever made.” But Warren later explained his shift from conservative law-and-order man to liberal this way: “On the Court I saw [things] in a different light.”
· When President Richard Nixon named Warren Burger as Chief Justice in 1969, he wanted to put the brakes on some of the activism of the Earl Warren years. But Burger did not exactly turn back the hands of time. One scholar wrote in 1981 that “the Court is today more of a center for the resolution of social issuses than it has ever been before.”
· When President Kennedy named Byron White to the Court in 1962, and described him as “the ideal New Frontier judge,” he probably didn’t think that White would become the conservative that he ultimately was.
· Conservatives were persuaded by President George H.W. Bush’s team that David Souter was one of them when he was named to the Court. But he became more liberal during his 18 years on the Court. It was his retirement in 2009 that paved the way for President Obama to appoint a Hispanic woman, Sonia Sotomayor, to the Court.
I’m sure President Obama will keep that in mind as he prepares to make his second nomination while trying to persuade 67 senators to vote his way. In the Senate there are many Republicans who have said they will vote "no" no matter who he nominates. There are nervous-Nelly Democrats afraid that a "controversial" nominee will affect their re-election bids. And, of course, there are various Democratic party loyalists, insiders and fundraisers demanding that the President appoint a black person, a woman, a very openly "progressive" person.
Who said that being President was all Easter egg-rolling festivities on the lawn?
Friday, April 9, 2010
Tiger, Tiger, Burning Bright
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
The Census and Me, Part 2
Monday, April 5, 2010
The Resurrection of Haiti
Consider this image of Haiti – specifically of a section of its capital, Port-au-Prince – published in The New York Times on March 27:
“The lights of the casino above this wrecked city beckoned as gamblers in freshly pressed clothes streamed to the roulette table and slot machines. In a restaurant nearby, diners quaffed Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Champagne and ate New Zealand lamb chops at prices rivaling those in Manhattan.
“This is the Pétionville district of Port-au-Prince, a hillside bastion of Haiti’s well-heeled where a mangled sense of normalcy has taken hold after the earthquake in January. Business is bustling at the lavish boutiques, restaurants and nightclubs that have reopened in the breezy hills above the capital, while thousands of homeless and hungry people camp in the streets around them, sometimes literally on their doorstep.”
Hmmm. Haiti’s leaders see the January 12 earthquake as “a rendezvous with history that Haiti cannot miss.” In a lengthy proposal presented March 31 to representatives of 130 potential donor nations, they outlined a 10-year rebuilding plan, while acknowledging that, long before that 35-second earthquake, Haiti was in trouble. “We understand the importance of reviewing our political, economic and social governance. We pledge to act in this regard,” the Action Plan for National Recovery and Development of Haiti, presented by President Rene Preval, said. “The earthquake must not obscure the desired goal: building a democratic Haiti that is inclusive and respectful of human rights.”
Unlike what seems to be the case as described in that New York Times piece -- or in what I observed in my first visit to Haiti some months ago.
It has been clear since January 12 that the world wants to help Haiti; but Haiti must assure that it is capable of accepting that help and moving forward as a sovereign democratic nation, not a beggar nation with its hands out and its corrupt officials leading the charge. The action plan says that Haiti “is committed to keeping up its efforts in the fight against corruption and to establish mechanisms capable of [ensuring] the greatest amount of transparency in the management of public funds.”
Preval and the team of government officials and international civilian experts have estimated the damage done to Haiti as a result of the earthquake at $8 billion.
From the action plan: “ Very soon after the earthquake, it was obvious that such a toll could not be the outcome of just the force of the tremor. It is due to an excessively dense population, a lack of adequate building standards, the disastrous state of the environment, disorganized land use and an unbalanced division of economic activity. The capital city (Port-au-Prince) accounts for more than 65 percent of the country’s economic activity and 85 percent of Haiti’s tax revenue.” Part of the long-term plan is to redistribute population to other parts of the island nation. That requires success in achieving one set of its goals: “…We must create jobs, re-house disaster victims, open schools and higher education institutions in preparation for the new school year, provide access to health care, prepare for the hurricane season, bridge the gap in state tax revenues, restart the administration and boost the economic channels.”
It took a 35-second earthquake to force the Haitian government to move in the direction it should have been for years of politicians more interested in deposing each other, an elitist class that has done little for the poor who inhabit areas like Cite Soleil and all that “where’s mine?” attitude that has inhibited legitimate trade.
Now a 55-page plan of action and impressive words from Preval, whose term ends in February 2011, are what we have. That and prayer.
Saturday, April 3, 2010
LESTER HOLT HAS THE WEEKEND OFF
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
The Census and Me
I received this from the National Urban League:
"Dear Friend,
"When the founding fathers met in Philadelphia during the Constitutional Convention, their work remained unfinished for almost 200 years until the passage of modern civil rights legislation. Even on the nation's census, the framers of the constitution only counted people of African descent as 3/5ths of a person. On April 1, 2010, you will have the power once again to finish their work. Let's make sure that our community really counts this time.
"On April 1st, the nation counts itself. You should have received a Census Form at your home or apartment that asks you several very simple questions."
Check out what the Census Bureau has well-known people, including Dorothy Height, saying about the importance of this effort: http://2010.census.gov/2010census/
BUT, GUESS WHATt? I have yet to receive a census form. I guess I’m on the way to not being counted – unless, of course, I raise hell!
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Martin Luther King Jr.
I think the Kennedys have it right. Rather than dwelling on the anniversaries of assassinations, they mark the birthdates of JFK and RFK with family rituals.
Having said that, I will share with you here some of the remarks I made at the 2004 birthdate observation of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The place was The Central Synagogue in midtown Manhattan, New York City. The hosts were Jews and blackfolks.
“When he was 18 years old, in 1947, he became his father’s assistant at Atlanta’s Ebenezer Baptist Church. He was ordained Feb. 25, 1948, a few weeks after he turned 19 and a few months before he graduated from Morehouse College.
“Fifty years ago, when King was 25, the civil rights revolution began in earnest when the U.S. Supreme Court decided that separate was not equal in the nation’s public school system and declared segregation unconstitutional. We as a nation are still grappling with the import of that decision. Even when I went to the ‘white’ high school, months after King’s death, my hometown was just getting around to implementing the Supreme Court’s decision of so long before to integrate ‘with all deliberate speed.’
“1954 was not only momentous because of the Brown decision, but that is also the year when MLK became pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama – 25 years old! 14 months later he was chosen to head the Montgomery Improvement Association, which was leading the bus boycott that began after Rosa Parks was arrested for refusing to relinquish her seat to a white man on a city bus. For the remainder of his life he was blessed and burdened by a role that, by Aug. 28, 1963, had made him as A. Phillip Randolph said in introducing him to an audience of hundreds of thousands in Washington, ‘the moral leader of our nation'….
“I come today not to presume what a living 75-year-old MLK would be doing other than going to church and enjoying birthday cake with his family. But I come to encourage all of us – myself included – to do as King did in his short life, which saw landmark litigation, marches, sit-ins, pray-ins, wade-ins, freedom rides, anti-war demonstrations.
“To me, it’s irrelevant whether King was a saint or not. He was a doer. When called upon to work to change what was wrong with the world, beginning in Montgomery, he took on the job, despite the sacrifices that entailed….
“Around Easter we Christians often sing, ‘Were you there when they crucified my Lord?’ Of course, we were not. That was thousands of years ago. But we can update that question to ask not just where we were during various stages in the struggles for justice and peace, but where we are and where we will be.”
Monday, March 29, 2010
Rain, Rain, Don't Go Away
The Incredibly Shrinking Mr. Preval
Sunday, March 28, 2010
RIGHT ON, MR. PRESIDENT!
While extremist knuckleheads are threatening the lives of the President and members of Congress because of their differences of opinion on health care reform, our Commander in Chief steathily went to Afghanistan today to boost morale of troops and, hopefully, kick Afghanistan’s president in the butt. To get this war -- and the one in Iraq -- over with, so-called leaders like Afghanistan's need to step up.
March Madness! So This Is An Excuse For Rape?
So many of us Baby Boomers, especially those who grew up in the South and were on the frontline of integrating one thing or another, have issues to this day. But I must say that Tom Payne is way beyond the way beyond.
He was the first black player on the University of Kentucky basketball team, and one can hardly imagine the hell he went through. But he has put others through a greater hell by raping them. I came across this article in which Payne essentially gives himself a pity party: he was an integration warrior without the armor to handle the task. So he became a rapist? “He has been imprisoned for all but three years since 1972, in three different states for three different convictions,” the Fanhouse article says. He is currently finishing out a sentence in Kentucky, but hoping he can be released early since he is nearly 60 and his mother is in her 80s and can use his help and, of course, he has a message to offer to young people who might go astray.
From the article: “Starting in Georgia at the end of his rookie season with the NBA’s Atlanta Hawks, then in Kentucky after cases were made against him while he was still in Georgia prisons, then in California in the 1980s after being paroled, then back in Kentucky in 2000 when he was paroled in California, for violating his parole in the previous state, Payne has been in prison for all but three of the last 38 years.”
Pity the fool.
He wants the University of Kentucky to recognize him as the pioneer that he was. But I cannot see a school honoring a man as a serial rapist frittered his life away.
Read the article and make your own call on this:
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Civil Society?
Sometimes I think we give too much credit to and are over-adoring towards The Founding Fathers. After all, while talking about liberty and justice for all, a bunch of them were slave owners and others benefited from slave trafficking. They talked about how “all men are created equal” while conveniently ignoring men who were not white property owners and ignoring women altogether.
I suppose the last time we were this "civil" was during the Civil Rights Movement and, before that, the Civil War. In both eras, many lives were lost.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
O Brother Where Art Thou?
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Al Sharpton Gets a Strange Stamp of Approval
What a difference access to money and tailored suits and the likes of Donald Trump and exclusive men’s clubs and expensive cigars and, oh yeah, the White House, makes. Al Sharpton has re-invented himself so many times since I met him in the 1980s when he was rotund, had hair permed on a regular basis as a homage to James Brown, wore shiny neon jogging suits and a huge Martin Luther King medallion around his neck. He has now done it again. But what’s really scary is that he has let Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal re-invent him and present him as what once was called “a safe Negro” who is acceptable in polite company and can be counted upon to bring blackfolks, specifically Democrats, to the voting booths in November. Check out a front page article in today’s (3/17) Wall Street Journal: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/16/obamas-new-partner-al-sharpton/
President Obama is mistaken in thinking that Sharpton, like Booker T. Washington so many decades ago, can speak for blackfolks and influence how they vote and how they live. Washington, an accomodationist, was an adviser to Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft during the segregation era. Sharpton, an unrepentant opportunist, is an adviser to President Obama in what is supposedly the “post-Civil Rights” era.
Many blackfolks remember -- not fondly -- the Sharpton of the garrish jogging suits and the incendiary language; the man who actually paid people to show up at his rallies to bamboozle gullible media into thinking he had a larger and more loyal following than he did. Those people are not likely to follow his lead in today’s political climate.
I may have a cup of tea with Sharpton or appear on his syndicated radio program, but for President Obama there is more at stake. He does not want to be known, as the WSJ declared today, as Sharpton’s “partner.”
Sharpton and Tavis Smiley, the broadcast host who is as good as Sharpton in the self-promotion arena, have tangled over Sharpton’s Obama connection. Smiley says, in the WSJ article, that it is hard “to speak truth to power about the suffering of black people on the one hand, and then be running in and out of the Oval Office and trying to run the president’s agenda or express White House talking points.” Professor Cornel West of Princeton is quoted as saying that Sharpton risks becoming “a symbolic insider.”
And this is part of the reason: The Wall Street Journal is a linchpin in Murdoch’s conservative communications empire that includes The New York Post and the Fox News Channel. Sharpton is a frequent guest on Fox shows hosted by Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity.
The French have a saying: The more things change, the more they remain the same. As Billie Holliday sang: Them that’s got shall get. Them’s that’s not shall lose. Sharpton’s got; a whole lot of blackfolks will lose because of his latest re-invention of himself as someone who no longer believes in the power of well-directed protest politics -- independent of those to whom he should be speaking truth.
Clarence and Ginni Thomas: The Yin and the Yang
I have defended Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas when I felt he deserved defense. But he is a nerdy weirdo. Prof. Linda Greenhouse so eloquently made the point in a piece published March 11 at opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com: “February 22 was the fourth anniversary of the last time Justice Thomas asked a question during an argument. His silent presence on the bench has evolved into a weirdly compelling example of performance art.”
His wife, on the other hand, has been very vocal as a member of that “tea party movement” that has risen as a so-called grassroots opposition to President Obama. In a Los Angeles Times piece by Kathleen Hennessey on March 14, Ginni Thomas told a gathering in Washington: “I am an ordinary citizen from Omaha, Neb., who just may have the chance to preserve liberty along with you and other people like you.” She wants to save the United States from Obama’s “hard-left agenda” and went on to say: “I have felt called to the front lines with you, with my fellow citizens, to preserve what made America great.”
Imagine the couple’s dinner talk. As a lifetime appointee to the court, Justice Thomas is supposed to be totally apolitical. His wife is anything but. Just as Justice Antonin Scalia seems to be his guardian angel and mentor on the court, his wife is probably just as influential at home.
His votes in coming cases bear greater scrutiny.
I’ll end this blog entry with a New York Daily News column I wrote in 1995 and that was part of the “body of work” that earned me a 1996 Pulitzer Prize for commentary (www.pulitzer.org)
CLARENCE THOMAS' INPUT IN RACE DEBATE
BY E.R. SHIPP
Wednesday, July 12th 1995, 1:14AM
THREE OF MY fellow Georgians stand at the forefront of our painful national debate on racism and remedies: House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the self-proclaimed leader of the Republican revolution; Rep. Cynthia McKinney, whose racially gerrymandered congressional district the Supreme Court deemed unlawful, and Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Court justice who, if you listen to some folks, was single-handedly responsible for that decision and an earlier one limiting the federal courts' role in the area of school desegregation.
Thomas has been pilloried, "called everything but a child of God," as we say in Georgia. But rather than being "an Uncle Tom," as so many are so quick to say, at times he sounds to me like W.E.B. Du Bois, the scholar, founding member of the NAACP and Pan-Africanist whose bona fides has not been called into question as far as I know.
You probably think I'm nuts, but consider what Du Bois had to say 60 years ago when educators like himself and lawyers such as Charles Hamilton Houston and Thurgood Marshall were debating what to do about segregated schools. Work to raise their quality, while conceding the reality of American apartheid? Or sue to end state-mandated segregation, arguing that integration was the only assurance black children could get a decent education?
In the July 1935 Journal of Negro Education, leading scholars, including E. Franklin Frazier, Ralph Bunche, Horace Mann Bond, Alain Locke and Du Bois, weighed in on the subject. Du Bois chastised blacks for their "utter lack of faith" in their own schools. "[A]s long as American Negroes believe that their race is constitutionally and permanently inferior to white people, they necessarily disbelieve in every possible Negro institution." The quality of the education should be paramount, he said, not whether black kids sat next to white kids in integrated classrooms. "The Negro needs neither segregated schools nor mixed schools," Du Bois declared. "What he needs is Education."
Thomas seemed to echo Du Bois a few weeks ago in finding that a federal judge had gone too far in requiring an elaborate desegregation plan to achieve racial balance in the public schools of Kansas City, Mo., where, in some instances, schools were 90% black. Looking at black students' poor academic performance, the federal judge concluded that there was a link between the high proportion of blacks and the low quality of the schools.
"It never ceases to amaze me that the courts are so willing to assume that anything that is predominantly black must be inferior," Thomas wrote in a passionate critique of the Kansas City plan. Of the Missouri court's insistence on racial balance, he said: "This position appears to rest upon the idea that any school that is black is inferior, and that blacks cannot succeed without the benefit of the company of whites."
Thomas, like Du Bois, would say to local school officials and parents: Fix the schools to make sure that they are indeed educating kids. Demand that every school gets its fair share of education dollars. Let kids go to school in their own neighborhoods if they choose. And forget about what proportion of students are of what race. Thomas agrees with Du Bois that it's wrong to use children as "battering rams" in the elusive goal of creating an integrated society.
Admittedly, Thomas is a strange bird, but he seems to have more faith in the ability of blacks to stand on their own two feet than do some of those who berate him. His is an Old Testament-style tough love. He is yes, I do believe this a proud black man. But a confused one.
"We're a mixed-up generation, those of us who were sent to integrate society," Thomas once said.
I'm part of that generation that was the first to integrate this, that or the other. We've got the bruises psychic, if not physical to show it. So who better than us the expeditionary troops, the cannon fodder to force Americans to confront racism and shape remedies that make sense for the 1990s? Black thought on racism did not begin with the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education case. The remedies we seek should not end with it.
---------------------------
The questions I raised at the end of that column remain. But Justice Thomas is probably the most messed-up, mixed-up member of his generation.